Podcast Feeds

Recent Episodes

Search



Our Widget




Our Sponsors

ISPN Gear

Monthly Archives

Podcasters

Stats & Other Stuff

« Information Salad #75: The Kerplunk! Episode | Home | Information Salad #77: We Have Questions »

Information Salad #76: The We Heart Politics Episode

By Slobokan | February 9, 2008

This week, we have a lively discussion about politics and we definitely don’t do sleepies.

Our theme song:

Bandwidth provided by:

Download the podcast: Information Salad - Episode #76

Topics: Information Salad |

One Response to “Information Salad #76: The We Heart Politics Episode”

  1. Joe Says:
    February 9th, 2008 at 7:38 pm

    Perot got 19% of the vote in 1992 to Nader’s 3% in 2000.

    Also, on Hot Air it said that Laura Ingraham said she learned Romney was leaving 10 minutes before she spoke. That might actually be worse than not telling her at all, because she had her entire speech ready to go and no time to change it.

    A liberal friend and I were talking about what to do with the primary season next time around. I definitely think that we should take a long, hard look at the primary format for next election. The problem is that when you do that, most people’s idea of changing the system involves finding a primary season where your candidate didn’t get it, then change everything around so that you would’ve gotten your way. Romney would still be in the race if it was proportional representation, but if we switch to a system like that, you never know if in 20 years another “McCain” will come along and end up winning under the new system. I pray to God that in 2012 the primary season doesn’t get pushed back an earlier.

    A few problems with the national primary day idea: Having really early caucuses/primaries helps convince the “no shot in hell”s to drop out. Having more options can be a good thing, but by the time the later primaries roll around, candidates are starting to get above 50% of the vote in states, as opposed to winning 25% of the vote against seven other candidates. In fact, I think that if they could somehow do it like American Idol (of course, eliminating the multiple voting) that would be MUCH more preferable to what we have now.

    Too bad in politics the way things go is to not fix things that are broken and to break things that are already fixed, so in 2012 we’ll probably see even earlier primaries, with the last ones ending at about the same time.

Comments